Hotel Mielparque Kumamoto

It's conveniently located in Kumamoto city. The building itself is clean, but the rooms feel old. However, the price is reasonable, so overall it's a plus.

It was a very convenient location, with easy access to Shimodori and Kamidori streets, and within walking distance of Kumamoto Castle. I think a shower room would be more convenient than a unit bath. Other than that, I was very satisfied.

Great, there are tons of parking lots near the restaurant.

Near the train station.

There is a parking lot next to the hotel, and the parking fee is not expensive, which is really great!

It was neither good nor bad.

After finishing the 30k trail run in Kumamoto, I searched for a 2-person twin room to stay in that day and made a reservation. The search results showed a 2-person twin room, and my name was automatically displayed as the reservation holder, so I proceeded with payment, but without knowing it, it changed to a 1-person reservation voucher. (The 1-person and 2-person prices for the twin room at this hotel are the same on Trip.com.) When I arrived at the hotel and tried to check in, they said that I had made a reservation for 1 person and asked for an additional fee (even though the 1-person and 2-person rates for the twin room were the same on Trip.com.) So I had no choice but to pay 8,000 yen. I filed a complaint with Trip.com, but they said it was my fault for booking a single room. (I kept checking for a 2-person 1-room twin room during the reservation process.) I hope you all will be careful not to experience the same thing. I do not recommend Trip.com.

Although there is a fee, there is a parking lot and it is close to the downtown area, so I think the location is very good. The lobby and rooms are spacious and comfortable, but I was concerned that the toilet didn't flush well and there were some brown stains (probably stuck there over the years). There was another single room at a very reasonable price, but I found out in the information section of Trip.com that the room didn't have a window, so I decided to go for a room with a window, although it was about twice the price (because it was a weekend). I chose it. I think it would be a shame to have a room without a window in this location near the river and the distance from other buildings. If renovation is not possible, I would like you to clearly state that the hotel's official website does not state that reasonably priced rooms do not have windows. I don't like rooms without windows, so if I had chosen a room without windows without knowing about it, it would have been a very disappointing trip. Also, although there were no rooms available for non-smoking and smoking was allowed, there was still a faint smell of cigarettes.