3-Star Hotels in Napa

A good place for short-term vacation, beautiful environment, but long-term stay is better than living in a resort

Hotel breakfast has no choice, what can only be eaten, the first day of breakfast can be tolerated, the next day breakfast is actually fried cakes, oil is difficult to swallow, Mexicans are also drunk to make breakfast. Hotel location is not bad, but the room is too small, the air conditioning is too noisy

A very controversial impression from this hotel. On the one hand: a beautiful mansion with a small number of rooms, with very interesting interior, real antique things, cozy, quiet, near the city center, with delicious breakfasts, spacious room. Two-room with two big beds. A big sauna that tried to make modern. But on the other hand, it feels that the patrons are doing a little favor that they let them live there at all. First, I don't understand why I took a four-adult room but it turns out it's booked for only two and I have to pay 50 dollars a day for each extra person. What did I pay for? The towel was only three and we didn't give us any extra. The room was cleaned because the maid went in once, why somehow feared that there were no adults in the room(children 12 and 14 years old), left and didn't return anymore. It turns out I paid only for extra breakfasts. Another strange moment: settlement strictly from 3 to 6 days. Three hours a day. Chances a little. There are questions to the sunglasses. It's cold. And, if you stand in the shower for a long time, the lighting is automatically turned off in the entire bathroom and you will stay in the excess darkness. Why is this invented? Whose convenience?

Breakfast, the environment is very good, if autumn comes, it will be more beautiful.