Peigenrou
December 2, 2024
Objective evaluation, from a tourist's perspective. 388 consumption
Background: The price remains high in the off-season, and the cost performance is not high. If it is the peak season, this price is okay
Analysis: A row of inns and B&Bs are located in the head, relying on publicity and platform exposure to attract traffic.
Service: Overall not good, like all local bosses, they don't care about repeat customers, they can kill one if they can, and they don't care whether there are tourists in the off-season. They are the same standard for foreign tourists. The attitude is definitely arrogant and not friendly. The housekeeper's communication is perfunctory, so you can't find any faults, but you will never find a bargain.
Room: Not big, in fact, it is a converted inn, the hygiene is average, but better than other B&Bs, after all, it is hotel-level, the hygiene is not thoroughly cleaned in the off-season, and there are marks on the mirror.
Location: It is near the stinking ditch and flies, so it is the geographical location of a homestay inn. The price is soaring after packaging. Of course, we have to consider that most of their money is spent on interpersonal communication and advertising. Breakfast: There are only corn and sweet potatoes, and they can be fooled if they can. If you don’t ask, the aunt will definitely not serve you. The aunt also got a fried egg. Overall: Don’t go in the off-season, because you will definitely not get a discount, because the residents of the scenic area don’t want repeat customers. You think you want quality, and you are willing to fight and suffer, but it is indeed at the level of high-end homestays. So it is not cost-effective. You can live in a high-end hotel at this price, because you don’t live outside, but in the room, so it is not cost-effective. I have also figured out the routines of local tourism and inns, and I always have to pay tuition.
Original TextTranslation provided by Google